## Archive for the ‘Expert Witness’ Category

Thursday, October 19th, 2017
Anyone who has spun a potter’s wheel is appreciative of the smooth motion of the flywheel upon which they form their clay, for without it the bowl they’re forming would display irregularities such as unattractive bumps. The flywheel’s smooth action comes as a result of *kinetic energy*, the energy of motion, stored within it. We’ll take another step towards examining this phenomenon today when we take our first look at calculating this kinetic energy. To do so we’ll make reference to the *two types of velocity associated with a spinning flywheel,* *angular velocity *and linear velocity, both of which engineers must negotiate anytime they deal with rotating objects.
Let’s begin by referring back to the formula for calculating *kinetic energy*, *KE*. This formula applies to all objects moving in a linear fashion, that is to say, traveling a straight path. Here it is again,
*KE =* ½ × *m × **v*^{2}
where *m* is the moving object’s mass and *v* its linear velocity.
Flywheels rotate about a fixed point rather than move in a straight line, but determining the amount of kinetic *energy* *stored within a spinning flywheel* involves an examination of both its *angular velocity* and linear velocity. In fact, the amount of *kinetic energy *stored within it depends on how fast it rotates.
For our example we’ll consider a spinning flywheel, which is basically a solid disc. For our illustrative purposes we’ll divide this disc into hypothetical parts, each having a mass *m* located a distance *r* from the flywheel’s center of rotation. We’ll select a single part to examine and call that *A*.
__Two Types of Velocity Associated With a Spinning Flywheel__
Part *A* has a mass, *m*_{A}, and is located a distance *r*_{A} from the flywheel’s center of rotation. As the flywheel spins, part *A* rides along with it at an angular velocity, ω, following a circular path, shown in green. It also moves at a linear velocity, *v*_{A}, shown in red. *v*_{A} represents the linear velocity of part *A* measured at any point tangent to its circular path. This linear velocity would become evident if part *A* were to become disengaged from the flywheel and cast into the air, whereupon its trajectory would follow a straight line tangent to its circular path.
The linear and angular velocities of part *A* are related by the formula,
*v*_{A} = r_{A} × ω
Next time we’ll use this equation to modify the basic kinetic energy formula so that it’s placed into terms that relate to a flywheel’s *angular velocity*. This will allow us to define a phenomenon at play in the flywheel’s rotation, known as the moment of inertia.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: angular velocity, energy stored, engineering, flywheel, kinetic energy, linear velocity, mass, moment of inertia, spinning flywheel

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Professional Malpractice | No Comments »

Tuesday, October 10th, 2017
Last time we introduced *angular velocity* with regard to **flywheel**s and how a fixed point riding piggyback on a moving flywheel travels the same circular path as its host at a pace that’s measured in units of degrees per second. Today we’ll introduce another unit of measure, the *radian*, and see how it’s uniquely used to measure angles of circular motion in units of radians per second.
__Radians and the Angular Velocity of a Flywheel__
Back in elementary school we worked with protractors and measured *angles* in degrees, and we were all too familiar with the fact that the average protractor maxed out at 180, or half the degrees present in a complete circle. But in the grownup worlds of physics and engineering, angles of circular motion are measured in units called *radians,* an international standard equal to 57.3 degrees that’s used to measure objects rotating in circular motion.
If we divide a circle’s value of 360 degrees by the 57.3 degrees that represent a *radian,* we find there are 6.28 radians in a circle, and oddly enough, it just so happens that 6.28 is equal to 2 × *π*. Anyone who stayed awake during math class can’t help but remember that *π* represents a constant value of 3.14, a number that pops up anytime you divide the circumference of a circle by its diameter. No matter the circle’s size, *π *will always result when you perform this operation.
Applying these facts to *radians,* we find that during one complete revolution of a **flywheel** the measure of the *angle* *θ* increases from 0 radians to 2*π* radians.
Suppose we have a flywheel spinning at *N* revolutions per minute, or RPMs. To calculate the *angular velocity,* ω, of any point on the flywheel, or the whole wheel for that matter, we use the following formula which provides an answer in radians per second,
*ω = *[2 × *π × **N* ] ÷ 60 *seconds/minute* (1)
If a **flywheel** spins at 3000 RPM, its *angular velocity* is calculated as,
*ω = *[2 × *π ×* (3000 RPM)] ÷ 60* seconds/minute* (2)
*ω = *314.16 *radians/second* (3)
Next time we’ll see how *angular velocity* is used to determine the kinetic energy contained within a flywheel.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: angular velocity, degrees, engineering, flywheel, kinetic energy, radians, revolutions per minute, RPM

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | No Comments »

Wednesday, October 4th, 2017
We introduced the **flywheel** in our last blog and the fact that as long as it’s spinning it acts as a *kinetic energy *storage device. Today we’ll work our way towards an understanding of how this happens when we discuss *angular velocity*.
*Angular velocity* is represented in engineering and physics by the symbol, ω, the Greek letter Omega. The term *angular* is used to denote physical quantities measured with respect to an angle, especially those quantities associated with rotation.
__Angular Velocity of a Flywheel__
To understand how *angular velocity* manifests let’s consider a fixed point on the face of a **flywheel**, represented in the illustration as *A. *When the flywheel is at rest, point *A* is in the 12 o’clock position, and as it spins *A* travels clockwise in a circular path. An angle, *θ*, is formed as *A*’s position follows along with the rotation of the flywheel. The angle increases in size as *A* travels further from its starting point. If *A *moves one complete revolution, *θ* will equal 360 degrees, or the total number of degrees present in a circle.
As the **flywheel** spins through its first revolution into its second, point *A* travels past its point of origination, and in two complete revolutions it will travel 2 × 360, or 720 degrees, in three revolutions 3 × 360, or 1080 degrees, and so forth. The degrees *A* travels continue to increase with each revolution of the flywheel.
*Angular velocity* represents the total number of degrees *A* travels within a given time period. If we measure the flywheel’s rotational speed with a tachometer and find it takes one second to make 50 revolutions, point *A* will have traveled the circumference of its path fifty times, and *A*’s *angular velocity* would be calculated as,
*ω = *(50* revolutions per second*) × (360 *degrees per revolution*)
*ω = *18,000 *d*e*grees per second*
Next time we’ll introduce a unit of measurement known as radians which is uniquely used to measuring the angles of circular motion.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: angular velocity, energy storage, engineering, flywheel, kinetic energy

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Angular Velocity of a Flywheel

Monday, September 25th, 2017
*What came first? The wheel or the flywheel?* Archeologists have been debating this question for decades. One thing is certain, they both date back to prehistoric times.
__What Came First? The Wheel or the Flywheel?__
One of the oldest *flywheel* discoveries was a potter’s *wheel,* used to make pottery. It’s a turntable made of stone or heavy wood that’s connected to a massive wheel by a spinning shaft. Once the potter got the flywheel spinning with his hand or foot, the wheel’s heavy weight kept it in virtual perpetual motion, allowing the potter to concentrate on forming the clay he shaped with his hands.
A potter’s *wheel,* or any other *flywheel* for that matter, takes a lot of initial effort to put into motion. In other words, the potter must put a lot of his own muscles’ mechanical energy into the flywheel to get it moving. That’s because its sheer weight binds it to the *Law of* *Inertia *and makes it want to stay at rest.
But once the *flywheel* is in motion, the potter’s mechanical energy input is transformed into kinetic energy, the energy of motion. The kinetic energy the potter produces by his efforts results in surplus energy stored within the flywheel. Hence, the flywheel serves as a kinetic energy storage device, similar to a battery which stores electrical energy. As long as the flywheel remains in motion, this stored energy will be used to keep the turntable spinning, which results in no additional mechanical energy needing to be exerted by the potter while forming pots.
The *flywheel’s* stored energy also makes it hard to stop once it’s in motion. But eventually the frictional force between the potter’s hands and the clay he works drains off all stored kinetic energy.
Since the Industrial Revolution flywheels have been used to store kinetic energy to satisfy energy demands and provide a continuous output of power, which increases mechanical efficiency.
Next time we’ll begin our exploration into the science behind flywheels and see how they’re used in diverse engineering applications.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: energy storage, engineering, flywheel, frictional force, inertia, kinetic energy, mechanical energy

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on What Came First? The Wheel or the Flywheel?

Friday, September 15th, 2017
It’s been awhile since we began our discussion of a pulley-belt assembly operating within a hydroponics plant, and we’ve solved for a lot variables and derived many equations along the way. Today we’ll tackle the two remaining variables, *T*_{1 }, the belt’s tight side tension, and *T*_{2} , its loose side tension, and we’ll determine exactly what *belt width* will *optimize* power transmission within our system.
__Optimizing Belt Width in a Pulley-Belt Assembly__
Last time we converted mechanical power, *P*, from horsepower into foot-pounds per second and the belt’s velocity, *V*, into feet per second in order to get things into terms we can work with. We then inserted these values into the mechanical power formula to get,
2,200 *foot pounds per second = (T*_{1} – T_{2}) × 3.93 *feet/second* (1)
This equation will allow us to solve for *T*_{1} and *T*_{2}, and from there we’ll develop a value for the *optimum belt width.*
Previously, we determined from the Euler-Eytelwein Formula that,
*T*_{1} = 2.38*T*_{2} (2)
Substituting equation (2) into equation (1), we get,
2,200 *foot pounds per second* = (2.38*T*_{2} – T_{2}) × 3.93 *feet/second* (3)
Reducing this equation with algebra we arrive at,
*T*_{2} = 405.65 *pounds* (4)
We can now insert equation (4) into equation (2) and calculate *T*_{1},
*T*_{1} = 2.38 × 405.65 *pounds* (5)
*T*_{1} = 965.44* pounds* (6)
*T*_{1} is maximum tension in the *belt,* specified by the manufacturer to be 300 pounds per inch of *width*, which makes the minimum *width belt* to be used to *optimize* power transmission within our pulley-belt assembly,
*w =* *T*_{1} ÷* *300* pounds per inch * (7)
*w =* 965.44* pounds ÷** *300* pounds per inch* (8)
*w =* 3.22* inches* (9)
We can use a *belt* of minimum *width* of 3.22 inches to safely transmit 4 horsepower from the engine to the pump without incurring breakage and slippage along the belt, thereby *optimizing* power transmission within our assembly. If we used a narrower belt, breaking and slippage would occur. If we used a wider *belt,* an unnecessary expense would be incurred.
Next time we’ll begin a discussion on flywheels as they apply to rotating machinery like gasoline and steam engines.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, belt width, belt-pulley assembly, loose side tension, maximum tension, mechanical power, optimizing power transmission, pulley, slippage, tight side tension

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Optimizing Belt Width in a Pulley-Belt Assembly

Monday, September 4th, 2017
We’ve been working our way towards developing values for variables in our example pulley-belt assembly, and last time we calculated the velocity of the belt in that assembly to be 237.99 feet per minute. But before we can go on to calculate the belt’s loose side tension, *T*_{2}, and tight side tension, *T*_{1}, we’ll need to discuss *unit conversion,* specifically how to convert *horsepower into foot-pounds per second*.
Our working formula for this demonstration is the formula for mechanical power, *P*, previously introduced and shown again here,
*P* = (*T*_{1} – T_{2}) × *V* (1)
By engineering convention mechanical power is normally measured in units of *foot-pounds per second*. But if you’ll recall from a past blog in which we determined the belt’s velocity, *V*, it was measured in units of feet per minute, not per second.* *
To further complicate things, the difference in belt tensions, *T*_{1} – T_{2}, is stated in units of pounds, and combining these elements together results in *P* being expressed in *foot-pounds per minute*, not the required per *second,* because we are multiplying feet per minute by pounds. That’s a whole lot of unit changing within a single equation, which makes for an awkward situation.
To smooth things out we’ll have to do some converting of units. We’ll start by dividing *V* by 60 seconds per minute so it can be expressed in units of feet per second,
*V = *237.99 feet per minute ÷* *60 seconds per minute (2)
*V = *3.93 feet/second (3)
The power in our belt was previously given as 4 *horsepower, *which must also undergo conversion and be put in terms of *foot-pounds per second* so it can be used in equation (1).
__Unit Conversion, Horsepower to Foot-Pounds per Second __
One *horsepower *is equal to 550 *foot-pounds per second*, which makes the amount of power, *P,* in our pulley-belt assembly equal to 2,200 *foot-pounds per second*.
Units converted, we can now insert the values for *V* and *P *into equation (1) to arrive at,
2,200 foot pounds per second = (*T*_{1} – T_{2}) × 3.93 feet/second (4)
Next time we’ll use this relationship to develop values for *T*_{1} and *T*_{2}, the belt’s tight and loose side tensions.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, belt and pulley assembly, belt velocity, engineering, foot pounds per second, horsepower, loose side tension, mechanical power, pulley, tight side tension, unit conversions, units

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Unit Conversion, Horsepower to Foot-Pounds per Second

Monday, August 28th, 2017
We’ve been discussing tangential velocity within the context of a pulley and belt assembly in recent blogs, and you may have wondered whether you encounter this phenomenon in your everyday life. Undoubtedly you have. Have you ever driven a long stretch of highway at a fast clip and suddenly come upon a curve in the road posted at a lower speed limit? If you happened not to notice the speed reduction, you may have found yourself slamming on the brakes to regain control of your car. You’ve been caught in a *tangential velocity danger* zone.
__Tangential Velocity Dangers__
As this road sign indicates, cyclists must also beware of potentially *dangerous* circumstances involving *tangential velocity*. It warns of an upcoming drop in the road, which, depending on their speed, has the potential to catapult them into the air.
Next time we’ll resume our discussion of *tangential velocity* and other factors within the context of our pulley-belt assembly.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, brakes, danger zone, pulley, pulley and belt assembly, speed, speed limit, tangential velocity

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Tangential Velocity Dangers

Monday, August 21st, 2017
Last time we developed an equation to compute *tangential velocity*, *V*, of the *belt* in our example pulley and belt system. Today we’ll plug numbers into this equation and arrive at a numerical value for this *belt velocity.*
**Belt Velocity**
The equation we’ll be working with is,
*V = π ×** D*_{2} ÷ * t*_{2} (1)
where, *D*_{2} is the diameter of Pulley 2 and *π* represents the constant 3.1416. We learned that Pulley 2’s *period of revolution*, *t*_{2}, is related to its rotational speed, *N*_{2}, which represents the time it takes for it to make one revolution and is represented by this equation,
*N*_{2 }= 1 *÷** t*_{2 }_{ }(2)
We’ll now solve for the *belt’s velocity,* *V,* using known values, starting off with rearranging terms so we can solve for *t*_{2},
*t*_{2} = 1 *÷** N*_{2 }_{ }(3)
We were previously given that *N*_{2} is 300 RPM, or *revolutions per* *minute*, so equation (3) becomes,
*t*_{2} = 1 *÷** *300* RPM = *0.0033 *minutes*_{} (4)
This tells us that Pulley 2 takes 0.0033 minutes to make one revolution in our pulley-belt assembly.
Pulley 2’s diameter, *D*_{2}, was previously determined to be 0.25 feet. Inserting this value equation (1) becomes,
*V = π ×** *(0.25 feet) ÷* *(0.0033 minutes) (5)
*V = *237.99 feet/minute (6)
We’ve now determined that the *belt *in our pulley-belt assembly zips around at a *velocity* of 237.99 feet per minute.
Next time we’ll apply this value to equation (6) and determine the belt’s tight side tension, *T*_{1}.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, belt velocity, loose side tension, minimum belt width, period of revolution, pulley, pulley and belt system, pulley diameter, pulley rotational speed, tangential velocity

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Belt Velocity

Monday, August 14th, 2017
Last time we introduced the *Mechanical Power Formula, *which is used to compute power in pulley-belt assemblies, and we got as far as introducing the term *tangential velocity,* *V,* a key variable within the Formula. Today we’ll devise a new formula to compute this *tangential velocity*.
Our starting point is the formula introduced last week to compute the amount of power, *P,* in our pulley-belt example is, again,
*P = *(*T*_{1} – T_{2}) ×* V * (1)
We already know that *P* is equal to 4 horsepower, we have yet to determine the belt’s tight side tension, *T*_{1}, and loose side tension, *T*_{2}, and of course *V,* the formula for which we’ll develop today.
__Tangential Velocity__
*Tangential velocity *is dependent on both the circumference, *c*_{2}, and rotational speed, *N*_{2}, of Pulley 2. The circumference represents the length of Pulley 2’s curved surface. The belt travels part of this distance as it makes its way from Pulley 2 back to Pulley 1. The rotational speed, *N*_{2}, represents the rate that it takes for Pulley 2’s curved surface to make one revolution while propelling the belt. This time period is known as the *period of revolution*, *t*_{2}, and is related to *N*_{2} by this equation,
*N*_{2 }= 1 ÷* t*_{2 }(2)
The rotational speed of Pulley 2 is specified in our example as 300 RPMs, or revolutions per minute, and we’ll denote that speed as *N*_{2} in light of the fact it’s referring to speed present at the location of Pulley 2. As we build the formula, we’ll be converting *N*_{2 }into velocity, specifically *tangential velocity*, *V*, which is the velocity at which the belt operates, this in turn will enable us to solve equation (1).
Why speak in terms of *tangential velocity *rather than plain old ordinary velocity? Because the moving belt’s orientation to the surface of the pulley lies at a *tangent* in relation to the pulley’s circumference, *c*_{2}, as shown in the above illustration. Put another way, the belt enters and leaves the curved surface of the pulley in a straight line.
Generally speaking, velocity is distance traveled over a period of time, and *tangential velocity *is no different. So taking time into account we arrive at this formula,
*V = c*_{2} ÷* t*_{2}_{ }(3)
Since the surface of Pulley 2 is a circle, its circumference can be computed using a formula developed thousands of years ago by the Greek engineer and mathematician Archimedes. It is,
*c*_{2} = *π ×** D*_{2 } (4)
where *D*_{2} is the diameter of the pulley and *π* represents the constant 3.1416.
We now arrive at the formula for *tangential velocity* by combining equations (3) and (4),
*V = π ×** D*_{2} ÷* t*_{2} (5)
Next time we’ll plug numbers into equation (5) and solve for *V*.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, belt velocity, circumference, engineer, loose side tension, mechanical power formula, period of revolution, pulley, pulleys, speed, tangential velocity, tight side tension, velocity

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on Tangential Velocity

Saturday, July 29th, 2017
Last time we determined the value for one of the key variables in the Euler-Eytelwein Formula known as the angle of wrap. To do so we worked with the relationship between the two tensions present in our example pulley-belt assembly, *T*_{1 }and *T*_{2}. Today we’ll use physics to solve for *T*_{2} and arrive at *the* *Mechanical Power Formula,* which enables us to compute the amount of *power *present in our *pulley and belt assembly*, a common engineering task.
To start things off let’s reintroduce the equation which defines the relationship between our two tensions, the Euler-Eytelwein Formula, with the value for *e, *Euler’s Number, and its accompanying coefficients, as determined from our last blog,
*T*_{1} = 2.38T_{2 } (1)
Before we can calculate *T*_{1 }we must calculate *T*_{2}. But before we can do that we need to discuss the concept of *power.*
__The Mechanical Power Formula in Pulley and Belt Assemblies__
Generally speaking, power, *P*, is equal to work, *W*, performed per unit of time, *t*, and can be defined mathematically as,
*P = W ÷** t* (2)
Now let’s make equation (2) specific to our situation by converting terms into those which apply to *a pulley and belt assembly*. As we discussed in a past blog, work is equal to force, *F*, applied over a distance, *d*. Looking at things that way equation (2) becomes,
*P = F ×** d ÷** t* (3)
In equation (3) distance divided by time, or “*d ÷** t*,” equals velocity, *V*. Velocity is the distance traveled in a given time period, and this fact is directly applicable to our example, which happens to be measured in units of feet per second. Using these facts equation (3) becomes,
*P = F ×** V* (4)
Equation (4) contains variables that will enable us to determine the amount of *mechanical power*, *P*, being transmitted in our *pulley and belt assembly*.
The force, *F*, is what does the work of transmitting *mechanical power* from the driving pulley, pulley 2, to the passive driven pulley, pulley1. The belt portion passing through pulley 1 is loose but then tightens as it moves through pulley 2. The force, *F,* is the difference between the belt’s tight side tension, *T*_{1}, and loose side tension, *T*_{2}. Which brings us to our next equation, put in terms of these two tensions,
*P = *(*T*_{1} – T_{2}) ×* V * (5)
Equation (5) is known as the *Mechanical Power Formula** ***in** *pulley and belt assemblies*.
The variable *V*, is the velocity of the belt as it moves across the face of pulley 2, and it’s computed by yet another formula. We’ll pick up with that issue next time.
Copyright 2017 – Philip J. O’Keefe, PE
Engineering Expert Witness Blog
____________________________________ |

Tags: belt, distance divided by time, engineering, Euler-Eytelwein Formula, Euler's Number, force, loose side tension, mechanical power, mechanical power formula, power, power transmitted, pulley, tight side tension, velocity, work

Posted in Engineering and Science, Expert Witness, Forensic Engineering, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Personal Injury, Product Liability | Comments Off on The Mechanical Power Formula in Pulley and Belt Assemblies